# Bangladesh Formally Protests Sheikh Hasina's Media Address in New Delhi, Warning of Possible Strain on Bilateral Relations with India

> Dhaka has registered a formal protest over former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's live media broadcast in New Delhi, cautioning that the event could harm bilateral ties.

**Type:** article · **Category:** World · **Published:** 2026-08-05 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/world/new-delhi-men-sheikh-hasina-ki-midiya-presa-varta-para-bangladesh-ne-darja-karaya-kara-aitaraja-india-ke-satha-dvipakshiya-rishton-14097 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Sheikh Hasina, Bangladesh, Tariq Rahman, India Bangladesh Relations, New Delhi, July Revolution, Foreign Ministry

The Bangladeshi government, headed by Tariq Rahman, has lodged a stern diplomatic objection regarding a live media address delivered by former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina from New Delhi. Official statements released by the Foreign Ministry in Dhaka indicated deep frustration that Indian authorities allowed the event to proceed, despite prior warnings raised by Bangladesh. Officials in Dhaka cautioned that permitting such public broadcasts on Indian soil risks placing a noticeable strain on bilateral relations between the two neighboring nations.

## Allegations of Sovereignty Violation and Disrespect to Revolution Martyrs
According to the statement from Bangladesh's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Sheikh Hasina has been convicted by the domestic legal framework and is currently residing outside the country. The ministry noted that her live media remarks contained several objectionable references targeting Bangladesh and its populace. Government representatives in Dhaka framed the broadcast as a direct manifestation of disrespect toward Bangladesh's national sovereignty, while also asserting that her comments insulted the memory of individuals who lost their lives as martyrs during the July Revolution.

The specific timing of the broadcast served as another major point of contention for authorities in Dhaka. The media session took place on the exact day when citizens across Bangladesh were observing the second anniversary of the July Revolution. Ministry officials described the decision to afford Sheikh Hasina a media platform on Indian territory during such an important national observance as deeply unfortunate. Dhaka emphasized that the occurrence severely hurt the sentiment of the Bangladeshi public.

## Rejection of Attempts to Alter Historical Records
The official communication further criticized the former Prime Minister for attempting to undermine findings documented in United Nations reports. These UN documents detailed civilian casualties and fatalities that occurred during the widespread protests in July and August 2024. Representatives from the Foreign Ministry asserted that the public in Bangladesh has consistently rejected any attempts to rewrite or misrepresent historical events, maintaining that such narratives will remain unacceptable to the nation.

## Post-Revolution Governance and Political Landscape
Highlighting the core principles established during the July Revolution, the Foreign Ministry underscored that the people of Bangladesh have resolved to prevent the country from reverting to any form of fascist governance. Furthermore, the statement reaffirmed that Bangladesh will not position itself as a dependent state under the influence of any external power. Authorities in Dhaka declared that following recent political shifts, Sheikh Hasina and her political associates no longer hold any viable place within Bangladesh's political structure.

## Core Principles Defining Future Bilateral Ties
While voicing strong objections, the ministry reiterated Dhaka's intent to sustain constructive, mutually beneficial, and forward-looking diplomatic engagement with India. However, Bangladeshi officials stressed that ongoing cooperation must be grounded in fundamental diplomatic principles, specifically sovereign equality, mutual respect, non-interference in domestic affairs, and preservation of national dignity.

## Reference to the 2013 Extradition Treaty
Concluding its declaration, the Foreign Ministry referred to the bilateral extradition treaty signed between India and Bangladesh in 2013. Authorities noted that Dhaka has submitted multiple formal requests under the provisions of this treaty seeking the extradition of Sheikh Hasina. However, Indian authorities have yet to issue an official response to these diplomatic submissions. Bangladeshi officials argued that allowing her access to public media in India under these circumstances undermines public sentiment and impedes the growth of harmonious diplomatic relations between the two countries.

## What this means for you
- **Across India:** Escalating diplomatic friction may affect cross-border trade, visa processing timelines, and bilateral ties between both nations.
- **In Bangladesh:** Diplomatic disagreements with India over extradition and foreign policy could reshape domestic politics and regional alliances.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Why did Bangladesh object to Sheikh Hasina's media address?
Bangladesh's Foreign Ministry stated that allowing Sheikh Hasina to give a live media address in India disrespected Bangladesh's sovereignty and insulted martyrs of the July Revolution.

### 2. Has Bangladesh requested Sheikh Hasina's extradition from India?
Yes, Dhaka has formally requested her extradition multiple times under the 2013 bilateral extradition treaty between India and Bangladesh.

### 3. What historical event's timing was highlighted by Bangladesh?
Dhaka pointed out that the address occurred on the second anniversary of the July Revolution, which deeply hurt Bangladeshi public sentiments.

### 4. What core principles did Dhaka outline for ties with India?
Bangladesh emphasized that bilateral relations must be based on sovereign equality, mutual respect, non-interference in internal affairs, and national dignity.

### 5. What was Bangladesh's stance on UN reports regarding the 2024 violence?
The Foreign Ministry accused Sheikh Hasina of attempting to deny UN reports on civilian casualties from July-August 2024, stating the public will reject historical revisionism.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._