Pakistan Steps Up as Self-Appointed Peacebroker With Abbas Araghchi Visit as US Calls It Deceitful Pakistan has invited Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to Islamabad in another bid to play mediator, drawing sharp criticism from US defence experts who label the country as a biased and duplicitous player. Geopolitical rules dictate that any mediator attempting to broker peace between hostile nations must possess global credibility, absolute neutrality, and undeniable diplomatic standing. Islamabad fails miserably on all these counts. The nation carries a well-established reputation for deceit, frequently stretching out its hand for American aid in the morning, courting Beijing by afternoon, and sitting down for tea with Tehran by evening. Pakistan's diplomatic maneuvering regarding tensions between Iran and the United States has repeatedly collapsed in the past. Despite this track record, a fresh political drama has unfolded in Islamabad as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was summoned to the Pakistani capital. This diplomatic outreach coincides with Washington labeling Pakistan a treacherous state. The Arrival of Abbas Araghchi and the Peacebroker Façade Following the invitation extended to Abbas Araghchi, Islamabad has once again activated a theatrical display to project itself as a major global peace broker. The underlying reality, however, is that prominent American policymakers and retired military commanders have exposed Pakistan's profound incompetence, lack of integrity, and flawed intentions as a mediator. Retired US Army general and esteemed defense expert Jack Keane has bluntly stated that nations like Pakistan and Qatar operate as compromised intermediaries who covertly undermine American interests to favor Iran behind closed doors. US Defense Expert Exposes Pakistan's Double Game Whenever hostilities between Washington and Tehran escalate to dangerous levels, Pakistan promptly injects itself into the diplomatic pipeline to salvage some semblance of a peacemaker's reputation. However, US defense analyst General Jack Keane stripped away this diplomatic veneer during an interview with Fox News. General Keane emphasized that intelligence agencies and major stakeholders across the Middle East are fully aware that both Pakistan and Qatar harbor extreme biases. These nations advance Iranian interests at the direct expense of American strategic objectives. He raised a pertinent question as to why a country with a proven historical record of betraying the United States continues to be granted a seat at the mediator's table. Relying on an opportunistic nation like Pakistan for diplomatic communication prevents Washington from accurately gauging Tehran's true intentions, thereby severely undermining America's negotiating posture. Pakistan functions as a strategic opportunist rather than a genuine peace broker. History bears witness that Pakistan has never engaged in sincere mediation to resolve any major international dispute. Whenever it assumes the responsibility of facilitating dialogue between two nations, its primary motive is never the establishment of peace, but rather the pursuit of threefold tactical gains. Extracting financial assistance and military hardware from the United States remains a core objective. Pakistan endeavors to render itself indispensable to Washington to secure spare parts for F-16 fighter jets, military assistance packages, and financial bailouts from the International Monetary Fund. Restoring its plummeting international standing is another driving factor. With its domestic economy in ruins and global perception tarnished by its association with terrorist networks, Islamabad attempts to polish its geopolitical image by positioning itself as a mediator. Shielding terrorist networks operating on its own soil is achieved by balancing ties between Iran and Washington, which allows Pakistan to deflect international scrutiny away from domestic extremist outfits like Jaish-ul-Adl and internal sectarian violence. A Long Legacy of Betrayal and Track Record Afghanistan serves as prime evidence of Pakistan's duplicitous game. While the United States was engaged in peace negotiations with the Taliban in Afghanistan, Pakistan presented itself as the primary mediator. Behind the scenes, however, Islamabad continued to accept billions of dollars in US assistance while simultaneously providing safe havens on its territory to Taliban insurgents. The inevitable consequence was a humiliating American withdrawal from Afghanistan. Pakistan's approach toward Iran has exhibited a similar degree of hypocrisy. While Islamabad publicly discusses pipelines and bilateral trade with Tehran, it never hesitates to align with Saudi Arabia and the United States in condemning Iran. The fragility of these relations was starkly evident when recent cross-border strikes by Iran inside Pakistani territory pushed the two neighbors to the brink of armed conflict. A nation incapable of managing basic diplomatic relations with its immediate neighbor can hardly be expected to arbitrate between the world's most bitter adversaries. Islamabad Scrambles Following Donald Trump's Strategic Signals When President Donald Trump recently signaled a preference for diplomatic channels over direct military strikes on Iran, Pakistan seized the moment with immediate urgency. It swiftly summoned Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to Islamabad. Through this gathering, Pakistani rulers sought to project themselves as the sole barrier preventing a third world war in the Middle East. Nevertheless, the hard reality remains that neither Washington takes Islamabad seriously nor does Tehran place an ounce of trust in Pakistan. National security circles in the United States are actively debating whether involving a treacherous intermediary like Pakistan in diplomatic channels constitutes a direct compromise of American national interests. The broader diplomatic chess match also brings Saudi Arabia's ambiguous stance into question alongside Pakistan. According to American analysts, Riyadh desires absolute security guarantees from the United States while simultaneously refusing to permit the use of its military bases for potential operations against Iran. Saudi Arabia prefers that Washington and Israel weaken Iran while avoiding any direct regional risk itself. Pakistan actively exploits this hesitant and ambiguous posture to carve out a niche between Riyadh and Washington by masquerading as the sole Muslim mediator. What this means for you Global Affairs Impact: The escalating tensions between Iran and the United States, coupled with Pakistan's mediation attempts, directly influence global diplomacy and regional security balances, potentially reshaping US policy decisions and Middle Eastern political alignments. Questions & Answers 1. Where has Abbas Araghchi been invited? Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has been invited to Islamabad. 2. Who questioned Pakistan's role as a mediator? Retired US Army general and defense expert Jack Keane questioned Pakistan's mediation role. 3. What did General Jack Keane call Pakistan and Qatar? He described Pakistan and Qatar as compromised and biased intermediaries who favor Iran. 4. Why does Pakistan pretend to be a peace broker? Pakistan attempts this to extract US dollars, salvage its declining international image, and deflect attention from domestic terrorist networks. https://trendkia.com/en/world/pakistan-steps-up-as-self-appointed-peacebroker-with-abbas-araghchi-visit-as-us-calls-it-deceitful-13659 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.