Three Senior Police Generals Detained in Indonesia Over Unlawful Wiretapping of President Prabowo Subianto and Public Figures Indonesian authorities have detained three senior police generals over alleged unauthorised wiretapping of President Prabowo Subianto and various high-profile figures. Indonesian authorities have taken three senior police generals into custody as part of an expanding inquiry into unauthorized electronic surveillance. Investigators state that the illegal wiretapping operation targeted high-profile individuals, including Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, alongside politicians, activists, and civic leaders. Police disclosed that the breach involved illicit access to digital communication infrastructure and the deliberate deletion of electronic logs to conceal evidence. Formal investigations remain active while law enforcement works to uncover the underlying motives behind the monitoring. Suspects Placed in Headquarters Detention Facility Asep Safrudin, who heads the Criminal Investigation Agency of the National Police, confirmed during an official media briefing that the three suspects are being held under direct custody. Safrudin stated that all three ranking officers have been transferred to the detention center at National Police headquarters in Jakarta. The scope of the inquiry focuses on unlawful communications interception, unauthorized intrusion into secure data platforms, and the targeted removal of digital evidence. At present, no public statements have been issued by President Prabowo Subianto or the detained officials. Investigators identified the detainees as Presidential Chief of Staff Gen Listyo Sigit Prabowo, alongside Inspector Gen Ahrie Sonta Nasution, who leads the Legal Division of the National Police. The third officer named in the case is Insp Gen Eko Hadi Santoso, an active instructor at the National Police Education and Training Institute. A spokesperson representing the Presidential Chief of Staff office could not be reached for comment regarding the detentions. President, Civic Figures, and Business Leaders Targeted Speaking at a news conference held late Tuesday at National Police headquarters in Jakarta, Safrudin detailed how the surveillance operation bypassed standard operational protocols. The suspects reportedly conducted nonprocedural and illegal intercepts against telephone numbers belonging to the President of the Republic of Indonesia, prominent state officials, political figures, media personalities, community leaders, nongovernmental organization activists, and business leaders. Authorities allege that the unauthorized surveillance took place across 2025 and 2026. Investigators stated that the officers commissioned intercepts without observing mandatory procedures outlined in a 2010 National Police regulation. According to Safrudin, numerous telephone numbers were fed into the Lawful Interception Management System, widely known as LIMS, completely circumventing procedural verification. This circumvention effectively neutralized the institutional checks intended to restrict electronic surveillance to authorized judicial inquiries. Hardware Confiscated and Data Erasure Allegations During the progression of the inquiry, police examined 10 civilian witnesses alongside three expert witnesses. Technical investigators also impounded multiple digital items to establish an evidentiary trail, securing 11 mobile phones, an iPad, and four flash drives. Forensic specialists anticipate that the analysis of these seized items will demonstrate how interception requests were generated, dispatched, and executed across the technical framework. Safrudin highlighted that the detained officers recently directed subordinate personnel to erase critical files directly from the LIMS platform. Investigators assert that the deleted digital files contained recordings and transcriptions of intercepted communications. Law enforcement officials determined that the data deletions were deliberately intended to eliminate traces of unauthorized access and suppress incriminating material. While investigators maintain that the probe remains ongoing, they have not publicly disclosed the broader intentions behind the monitoring network. Charges Filed Under Revised Penal Code and Cyber Statutes Coordinating Minister for Law, Human Rights, Immigration and Corrections Yusril Ihza Mahendra addressed the legal ramifications, stating that investigators discovered no indications of treason in the suspects' conduct. Mahendra explained that the three individuals will face prosecution under Article 258 of Indonesia's new Criminal Code, a statute addressing the illegal interception and surveillance of nonpublic electronic communications, which carries penalties of up to 10 years of imprisonment. The suspects also face prosecution under Article 332 of the revised penal code, which specifies a maximum sentence of six years in prison. Furthermore, prosecutors are preparing charges under Article 32 of Indonesia's Electronic Information and Transactions Law, which penalizes the unauthorized alteration, destruction, deletion, transfer, or concealment of electronic data. Authorities confirmed that the criminal investigation is actively proceeding, and officials have yet to disclose the final motive behind the surveillance. What this means for you The detention of high-ranking security officials over unlawful electronic eavesdropping will likely trigger stricter enforcement of data protection protocols and surveillance limits. • Regulatory Oversight: Enforcing accountability against ranking officers demonstrates a tightening of safeguards surrounding institutional electronic monitoring systems. Moving forward, digital surveillance operations will face elevated verification standards to prevent unlawful administrative intrusion. • Civil Protections: Heightened legal scrutiny provides stronger protections for journalists, activists, and civic organizations against warrantless data collection. This case establishes a precedent reinforcing privacy rights across broader electronic communication platforms. • Statutory Penalties: Applying Article 258 and cybercrime statutes signals severe institutional consequences for tampering with official communication databases. Future violators face statutory imprisonment ranging between six and ten years for unauthorized digital access. • Institutional Integrity: Auditing electronic interception records will likely become a mandatory procedural step within law enforcement command structures. This enforcement reduces systemic abuse within electronic communication networks and ensures strict compliance with procedural codes. Why this happened The situation developed when high-ranking officials bypassed statutory surveillance protocols and entered unauthorized phone numbers directly into national interception databases. • Direct Trigger: Ranking officers ordered the interception of communications belonging to the president and prominent figures without securing mandatory authorizations under 2010 police regulations. This unauthorized directive led to illicit tracking operations between 2025 and 2026. • Systemic Circumvention: Targets were enrolled directly into the Lawful Interception Management System without required verification safeguards. Bypassing mandatory checks allowed the illicit data collection to proceed unchecked within legitimate monitoring infrastructure. • Evidence Concealment: Suspects subsequently issued orders to purge digital files and communication records from surveillance servers. This effort to erase forensic traces resulted in supplemental charges regarding electronic data destruction. • Unresolved Motive: Cabinet officials confirmed that investigators identified no signs of treason, while the definitive motive behind the monitoring network remains under active investigation. Questions & Answers 1. Which senior police officers were detained in the wiretapping probe? Authorities detained Presidential Chief of Staff Gen Listyo Sigit Prabowo, Legal Division head Inspector Gen Ahrie Sonta Nasution, and training instructor Insp Gen Eko Hadi Santoso. 2. Who was targeted by the alleged unauthorized wiretapping? The surveillance targeted Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, state officials, politicians, media figures, civic leaders, NGO activists, and business executives. 3. When did the unauthorized surveillance take place? Investigators revealed that the illicit wiretapping occurred between 2025 and 2026. 4. What digital evidence was confiscated by investigators? Police seized 11 mobile phones, one iPad, and four flash drives during their investigation. 5. What criminal charges do the detained generals face? The suspects face charges under Articles 258 and 332 of the new Criminal Code, as well as Article 32 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. 6. Did the investigation reveal any evidence of treason? Coordinating Minister Yusril Ihza Mahendra confirmed that investigators found no indication of treason in the case. https://trendkia.com/en/world/indonesia-ke-rashtrapati-prabowo-subianto-aura-pramukha-hastiyon-ki-jasusi-mamale-men-tina-varishtha-pulisa-janarala-hirasata-men--55986 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.