CJI Surya Kant Clarifies NALSAR Convocation Controversy, Says Invitation Was Never AcceptedTelangana
17 Aug 2026, 7:19 am (1 day ago)· 3

CJI Surya Kant Clarifies NALSAR Convocation Controversy, Says Invitation Was Never Accepted

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has clarified that he never gave consent to attend the convocation ceremony at NALSAR University of Law as chief guest, clearing the air following recent student protests and Bar Council actions.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant has put an end to ongoing speculation surrounding his presence at the convocation ceremony of the National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University of Law. He clarified that he had never accepted or agreed to the institution's invitation in the first place.

Background of the Convocation Controversy

The controversy began when a section of students voiced objections to the proposed presence of the Chief Justice as the chief guest for the convocation. The situation escalated after the Bar Council of India (BCI) intervened and initially issued a directive calling for a boycott of the graduating students involved in the protest. BCI later retracted its statement and expressed regret over the decision.

Also read

Objection to Bar Council Intervention

Following the BCI's stance, the Supreme Court sought an explanation from the council. CJI Surya Kant had expressed strong disapproval over the council's rigid measure, emphasizing that matters involving students should be handled directly and did not warrant outside escalation.

Statement Following Jodhpur Address

Hours after addressing a gathering of Vice-Chancellors from National Law Universities in Jodhpur, CJI Surya Kant stated clearly that he had never consented to NALSAR's invitation. This statement resolves the confusion surrounding his expected attendance at the university event.

Questions & Answers

What clarification did CJI Surya Kant provide regarding the NALSAR convocation?
CJI Surya Kant clarified that he had never accepted or consented to NALSAR University's invitation to attend as chief guest.
What triggered the controversy at NALSAR University?
A group of students had raised objections regarding the invitation sent for the convocation ceremony.
How did the Bar Council of India (BCI) react initially?
BCI initially issued a call to boycott the protesting students, but later expressed regret and withdrew its order.
What was CJI Surya Kant's position on BCI's intervention?
CJI Surya Kant disapproved of the BCI's action, stating that matters concerning students should be handled directly.
Where did CJI Surya Kant make these remarks?
He made the clarification after addressing a meeting of National Law University Vice-Chancellors in Jodhpur.

Comments 2

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·1d ago

CJI Surya Kant's clarification underscores the boundaries between the judiciary and statutory bodies. The standoff involving student protests, the Bar Council's intervention, and the Supreme Court's subsequent scrutiny reveals how administrative overreach can complicate academic events. Moving forward, universities must ensure absolute transparency and protocol compliance regarding high-profile invitations to prevent institutional friction and unnecessary controversies.

Ravikash Gupta@ravikash·1d ago

Building on Karan Malhotra's analysis, it is crucial to note that such administrative standoffs and institutional controversies directly impact campus autonomy and the credibility of legal education. When the highest judiciary has to publicly clarify its stance, it reflects a communication gap between higher educational institutions and their management systems. Moving forward, universities must adopt a more professional and transparent approach toward such events to prevent awkward situations and unnecessary friction.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR