Cape Town Test DRS Row: ICC Reprimands South Africa Coach Ashwell Prince and Kyle VerreynneCricket
2 Nov 2026, 6:36 pm (1 hour ago)· 0

Cape Town Test DRS Row: ICC Reprimands South Africa Coach Ashwell Prince and Kyle Verreynne

The ICC has officially reprimanded South Africa batting coach Ashwell Prince and squad member Kyle Verreynne, handing each one demerit point for disputing an umpire's decision during the third Test against Australia in Cape Town.

A contentious decision involving the Decision Review System during the third Test between South Africa and Australia in Cape Town has resulted in formal disciplinary action. The International Cricket Council (ICC) issued an official reprimand to South Africa batting coach Ashwell Prince and cricketer Kyle Verreynne following an incident that unfolded immediately after opening batsman Marques Ackerman lost his wicket in the hosts' second innings.

The 15-Second DRS Window Dispute

The controversy started when Marques Ackerman was given out and sought to challenge the on-field decision through a player review. The match officials declined the request, ruling that the mandatory 15-second timer allocated for signaling a review had already run out. According to standard match conditions, once that window closes without a clear signal from the batter, the on-field decision stands without further deliberation.

Also read

Boundary Line Delays and Arguments with Officials

As Ackerman began walking off towards the pavilion, batting coach Ashwell Prince engaged in repeated arguments with the match officials. Prince insisted that the countdown had not expired and that the batting side still had valid time remaining to request ball-tracking and technology replays. Simultaneously, squad member Kyle Verreynne, who was not included in South Africa's playing eleven for the fixture, intervened by telling Ackerman to remain inside the boundary ropes. This instruction caused an unnecessary delay in Ackerman leaving the field of play, directly hindering the resumption of the contest.

Admission of Guilt and Penalties Handed Down

Following a review of the incident, the governing body confirmed that both Prince and Verreynne breached Article 2.8 of the Code of Conduct. This regulation specifically governs actions that show dissent toward an umpire's decision during an international match. Because neither individual had committed a disciplinary violation in the preceding 24-month period, each had one demerit point added to their disciplinary record. Both Prince and Verreynne accepted the sanction proposed by ICC match referee Javagal Srinath, eliminating the requirement for any formal disciplinary hearing.

Match Officials Report and Series Outcome

The charges against the coaching staff member and player were brought forward by on-field umpires Richard Illingworth and Richard Kettleborough, third umpire Chris Gaffaney, and fourth umpire Lubabalo Gcuma. Breaches categorized under Level 1 generally carry penalties ranging from an official warning up to a 50 percent fine of match fees, alongside one or two demerit points. Despite the disruption on the third afternoon, South Africa rallied strongly on the fourth day and unleashed clinical bowling on the final day to overcome Australia, sealing a 2-1 victory in the Test series.

Questions & Answers

Who did the ICC penalize in the South African camp?
The ICC penalized South Africa batting coach Ashwell Prince and cricketer Kyle Verreynne for breaching the code of conduct.
When and where did this incident occur?
The incident took place on the third day of the third Test against Australia in Cape Town during South Africa's second innings.
What triggered the dispute initially?
Opening batsman Marques Ackerman sought a DRS review after being dismissed, but umpires refused because the 15-second time limit had expired.
What specific actions led to the charges against Prince and Verreynne?
Ashwell Prince argued with umpires regarding remaining time, while Kyle Verreynne instructed Ackerman to delay leaving the field at the boundary rope.
What penalty was imposed on both individuals?
Both received an official reprimand alongside one demerit point added to their disciplinary records.
Was a formal disciplinary hearing held?
No formal hearing was needed because both individuals admitted to the offense and accepted the sanctions from match referee Javagal Srinath.
What was the final outcome of the Test and series?
South Africa fought back to defeat Australia in the Cape Town Test and claimed the series 2-1.

Comments 0

No comments yet — be the first.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR
Chamar no WhatsApp