Priyank Kharge Rejects B.L. Santhosh Claim on Hyderabad Merger History, Credits Nehru, Patel, and Indian Army for Family ProtectionPolitics
15 Aug 2026, 8:20 pm (2 hours ago)· 1

Priyank Kharge Rejects B.L. Santhosh Claim on Hyderabad Merger History, Credits Nehru, Patel, and Indian Army for Family Protection

A sharp political row has erupted in Karnataka after Home Minister Priyank Kharge refuted BJP leader B.L. Santhosh's claim that RSS volunteers protected Mallikarjun Kharge's family from Razakars during the merger of Hyderabad.

A fresh political controversy has broken out in Karnataka over the historical narrative surrounding the integration of the erstwhile princely state of Hyderabad into the Indian Union. Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge has strongly rejected claims made by Bharatiya Janata Party National General Secretary B.L. Santhosh regarding the role of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh during the period of partition and annexation. B.L. Santhosh had claimed that RSS volunteers rescued Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge's family from the atrocities of the Razakars. Refuting this assertion, Priyank Kharge stated that his family and the residents of the region were protected not by the RSS, but by then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, and the Indian Army. He raised questions regarding historical events, asking why the Indian military had to execute Operation Polo if the RSS had already been protecting the local population.

A Fresh Political Clash Over Hyderabad's Annexation History

The political confrontation began following remarks made by senior BJP leader B.L. Santhosh during an event organized by the Hindu Jagrana Vedike to mark Akhand Bharat Sankalp Diwas. Addressing the gathering, Santhosh recalled the turbulent period of the late 1940s when the princely state of Hyderabad was being merged into India. He asserted that during the partition era, RSS workers stood firm against the armed Razakar militias to safeguard local Hindu communities. To illustrate his point, Santhosh referenced the childhood history of Mallikarjun Kharge, stating that Kharge's family was forced to flee their ancestral village due to widespread violence and relocate to Gulbarga, now known as Kalaburagi. Santhosh claimed that Mallikarjun Kharge's father had to escape with only the clothes he was wearing, and argued that RSS volunteers were present on the ground to support affected citizens during that crisis.

Also read

Priyank Kharge's Counterattack and Credit to the Indian Armed Forces

Responding to B.L. Santhosh's statements while interacting with media personnel in Kalaburagi, Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge pushed back firmly against the BJP leader's version of history. Priyank Kharge asserted that the RSS did not come to protect his family or the people of the region. Acknowledging that his family had suffered directly from communal violence during that period and was compelled to leave their home region, he clarified that peace and security were restored only through official state action. He credited the protection of the civilian population to the leadership of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, and the deployment of the Indian Army. Priyank Kharge stated that it was the intervention of the Indian armed forces that guaranteed the safety of the local population during the unrest.

'Operation Polo' and the Military Campaign of September 1948

Challenging the narrative of RSS guardianship, Priyank Kharge pointed to Operation Polo, the military action undertaken to integrate Hyderabad into India. He posed a direct question to B.L. Santhosh, asking whether Operation Polo had been conducted by the RSS. Highlighting historical records, Kharge noted that the Indian Army launched Operation Polo in September 1948 against the armed forces of the Nizam of Hyderabad, leading to the state's integration into India. Priyank Kharge further alleged that instead of protecting citizens during communal disturbances, elements associated with the RSS had on several occasions heightened communal tensions. He questioned where RSS leaders and workers were stationed when communal violence was actively damaging his region.

Debates Over Gandhi's Assassination, Godse, and Savarkar

Expanding his critique, Priyank Kharge referenced the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi and the political ideologies linked to that period. He alleged that Nathuram Godse was a follower of V.D. Savarkar and was influenced by the ideology of the RSS. Kharge noted that widespread communal riots broke out in cities like Kolkata and Delhi following Mahatma Gandhi's assassination. He criticized the RSS for presenting itself as a protective organization, alleging that its historical role was contrary to such claims. Priyank Kharge also addressed Santhosh's references to Savarkar and Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's Azad Hind Fauj. He claimed that while Subhas Chandra Bose was actively recruiting soldiers for the Azad Hind Fauj to fight British rule, Savarkar had urged Indian youths to join the British military instead. Kharge emphasized that modern unified India exists because of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel's efforts in integrating approximately 560 princely states and territories, rather than actions by the RSS.

Arguments Over RSS Registration and Freedom Movement Views

In response to Priyank Kharge's earlier questions regarding the legal status and registration of the RSS, B.L. Santhosh defended the organization's structure. Santhosh stated that the RSS was not registered at the time of independence and remains unregistered today, arguing that formal registration does not determine the existence or legitimacy of an organization. He maintained that the RSS operates on the trust and commitment of millions of volunteers. Santhosh asserted that during partition, RSS workers stood by the people without relying on formal registration structures. Furthermore, addressing the broader history of the independence movement, Santhosh remarked that India did not gain independence solely through the salt satyagraha or by spinning the charkha. He stated that freedom was achieved through the sacrifices of thousands of revolutionaries, freedom fighters, patriotic youth, and soldiers who risked their lives for the nation.

Questions & Answers

What claim did B.L. Santhosh make regarding the Kharge family?
B.L. Santhosh claimed that RSS volunteers protected Mallikarjun Kharge's family from Razakar attacks during the Hyderabad state merger, forcing them to flee to Gulbarga.
How did Priyank Kharge respond to B.L. Santhosh's assertions?
Priyank Kharge rejected the claim, stating that his family and the local populace were protected by Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Patel, and the Indian Army, not the RSS.
When was 'Operation Polo' conducted for the integration of Hyderabad?
The Indian Army executed the military campaign known as 'Operation Polo' in September 1948 to integrate the princely state of Hyderabad into India.
What allegations did Priyank Kharge level regarding Savarkar and Azad Hind Fauj?
Priyank Kharge alleged that while Subhas Chandra Bose recruited for the Azad Hind Fauj, Savarkar urged people to join the British military.
What was B.L. Santhosh's stance regarding the registration of the RSS?
B.L. Santhosh stated that the RSS was not registered then nor is it registered today, asserting that an organization's existence depends on people's trust rather than formal registration.

Comments 4

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·24m ago

This controversy highlights an intense battle over historical claims and political narratives. When public security, the military's 'Operation Polo', and personal tragedies are brought into political clashes, it risks fueling polarization. Moving forward, the impact of such rhetoric on regional social harmony and political stability requires close monitoring and thorough investigative follow-up.

Kavya Nair@kavya-nair·24m ago

This clash of historical claims and political narratives extends beyond politics, impacting the cultural and social fabric of regions that are sensitive for travelers and tourism. When polarization over such issues increases, it can deeply affect the local economy, cultural harmony, and lifestyle of tourist destinations, raising questions about safety and stability for visitors exploring these historic areas.

Rohan Verma@rohan-verma·1h ago

This controversy highlights how historical events and personal narratives are being utilized for current political polarization. Such ideological clashes are becoming key tools to set narratives in regional politics for upcoming elections, with each party interpreting history to suit its political convenience.

Ravikash Gupta@ravikash·1h ago

This ideological clash goes beyond electoral narratives, potentially impacting corporate and financial investment sentiment. Regional instability and escalating political tensions create uncertainty within state economic corridors, posing a clear risk of affecting investor confidence moving forward.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR