Delhi High Court Seeks Salman Khan's Reply on 'Kaala Teetar' Producer's Plea Challenging JurisdictionBollywood
9 Oct 2026, 5:14 pm (1 hour ago)· 0

Delhi High Court Seeks Salman Khan's Reply on 'Kaala Teetar' Producer's Plea Challenging Jurisdiction

The Delhi High Court has granted Salman Khan four weeks to reply to a plea by the makers of the film 'Kaala Teetar' questioning the court's territorial jurisdiction.

In an ongoing legal dispute surrounding the film titled 'Kaala Teetar', the Delhi High Court has directed actor Salman Khan to submit his response within four weeks to a plea moved by the film's producer. The filmmaker approached the bench seeking directions to recall the suit filed by Khan that aimed to stall the movie's rollout. A central contention raised by the production side asserts that the Delhi court lacks the necessary territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate the lawsuit initiated by the actor. Taking note of these arguments, the high court asked the actor to clarify his position, scheduling the next hearing in the case for December 16.

The Core Dispute Triggered by the Teaser

The conflict initially erupted following the public unveiling of the promotional poster and teaser for 'Kaala Teetar'. Salman Khan strongly objected to the visuals, claiming that the production depicted a central protagonist who bore an unmistakable, striking resemblance to his real-life persona. A key point of contention was the prominent display of a turquoise bracelet on the character's wrist, an accessory widely recognized as the actor's personal signature. Khan maintained that the production deliberately mirrored his public identity, exploiting his distinct personality and style without obtaining prior consent or authorization.

Also read

Personality Rights and the 1998 Incident Reference

In his petition before the court, Khan pointed out that the promotional teaser featured scenes referencing the 1998 blackbuck poaching episode, an event that has historically remained attached to his public narrative. The actor argued that aspects of his personal legal struggles were deliberately woven into the film's plotline and leveraged to generate publicity for the project. According to his submission, utilizing sensitive chapters of his private life for commercial promotion tarnishes his public reputation and constitutes an infringement of his recognized personality rights.

Director Bharat S. Shrinet Defends the Project

Rebutting the allegations, director Bharat S. Shrinet maintained that the cinematic venture does not revolve around Salman Khan in any manner. The filmmaker stated that the narrative is entirely fictional, with the protagonist being a distinct fictional persona named 'Ayaan Khan'. Addressing the dispute over the accessory, Shrinet argued that such bracelets are not exclusive to Khan and are worn by many individuals. Furthermore, he clarified that the lead actor did not undergo any prosthetic makeup or physical modifications to emulate Khan's appearance. Earlier in the proceedings, on July 27, the Delhi High Court had issued an interim order directing the removal of online links to the teaser and related promotional material after Khan raised urgent objections.

Questions & Answers

Why has the Delhi High Court granted Salman Khan four weeks?
The court granted Salman Khan four weeks to file his response to a plea by the film's producer challenging the territorial jurisdiction of the lawsuit.
What relief did the film's producer seek from the court?
The producer requested the court to direct Salman Khan to withdraw his lawsuit seeking a stay on the film, arguing the Delhi court lacks territorial jurisdiction.
When is the next hearing scheduled for this case?
The Delhi High Court has scheduled the next hearing in this matter for December 16.
What primary objections did Salman Khan raise against the teaser?
Khan objected that the protagonist closely resembled him, wore his signature bracelet, and referenced the 1998 blackbuck case, infringing on his personality rights.
How did director Bharat S. Shrinet respond to the allegations?
The director stated that the film is fictional with a character named 'Ayaan Khan', and no prosthetic makeup was used to make the actor look like Salman Khan.
Did the court issue any prior interim order regarding the teaser?
Yes, on July 27, the Delhi High Court ordered the interim removal of online links to the film's teaser and related content following Khan's plea.

Comments 0

No comments yet — be the first.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR
Chamar no WhatsApp