CJI Surya Kant Addresses Delhi Protests and Security Restrictions, Declares Law and Order Outside Court DomainDelhi
12 Oct 2026, 5:46 pm (1 hour ago)· 0

CJI Surya Kant Addresses Delhi Protests and Security Restrictions, Declares Law and Order Outside Court Domain

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant stated that civic restrictions and ongoing demonstrations fall under law and order. He also declined a meeting with opposition leaders over electoral grievances.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant stated that maintaining security and addressing public demonstrations in the national capital fall under the domain of law and order, which is not an issue for the judiciary. Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the 33rd Foundation Day event of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) at Vigyan Bhawan on 12 October, the CJI declined to comment directly on the ongoing demonstrations against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar or the resulting civic movement restrictions.

Refusal to Meet Opposition Leaders over Voting Concerns

The CJI addressed queries regarding a meeting request submitted by Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi. The two senior leaders had written to the CJI seeking an appointment between 4 PM and 5 PM on Monday to hand over a memorandum on alleged vote theft. Their demands included the immediate resignation of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, a stay on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, and a return to paper ballots for future elections. CJI Surya Kant declined the interaction, explaining that he had communicated his reasons through an official reply. He maintained secrecy regarding the communication, noting that the contents of the letter remain confidential. He also refrained from making any remarks on the opposition's proposed protest march to the Supreme Court.

Also read

Judicial Doors Open to Every Citizen

Commenting on the persistent demonstrations led by members of the Cockroach Janta Party and various lawmakers, the CJI underlined that access to justice remains open to all. He observed that every Indian national, whether an ordinary individual or an elected public representative, possesses the statutory right to approach the highest court. He assured that the judiciary would evaluate any matter brought before it strictly according to law and restore fundamental rights wherever required.

Mass Detentions and the JPC Simultaneous Elections Consultation

The national capital recently witnessed extensive security arrangements over the weekend to handle the civil unrest. On 10 October, authorities shuttered 45 metro stations and instituted detailed checks across border checkpoints, leading to the temporary detention of thousands of individuals, including prominent Cockroach Janta Party figures and former chief ministers. Separately, regarding the cancellation of an informal meeting with the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on simultaneous elections, the CJI clarified that judges decided against it to avoid potential conflicts of interest. Since legislation or decisions stemming from the committee could later be challenged before the apex court, CJI Surya Kant and his fellow judges concluded that participating in informal deliberations would be inappropriate. JPC Chairman P. P. Chaudhary had earlier confirmed that an initial plan for informal discussions was subsequently withdrawn by the Supreme Court on ethical grounds.

Questions & Answers

What was CJI Surya Kant's stance on the Delhi protests and restrictions?
The CJI stated that law and order issues are beyond the court's concern and fall entirely under public administration.
What were the main demands in the opposition's letter to the CJI?
Opposition leaders requested the resignation of the CEC, a stay on electoral roll revisions, and a return to paper ballots.
Why did the CJI decline the meeting request from Congress leaders?
The CJI communicated his refusal directly via letter, citing confidentiality regarding the specific reasons.
Why did the Supreme Court cancel its informal meeting with the JPC?
The judiciary cancelled the session to avoid any potential conflict of interest should simultaneous election laws face future legal challenges.

Comments 4

Arjun Mehta@arjun-mehta·21m ago

Courts shouldn't become political arenas, the CJI made the right call by staying away.

Arshdeep Ahluwalia@arshdeep-ahluwalia·21m ago

You're right, Arjun, but whenever such protests and metro shutdowns happen in Punjab and Haryana, it's the common public that suffers the most.

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·40m ago

Shutting down 45 metro stations in a single day is ridiculous, it made life impossible for daily commuters.

Rohan Verma@rohan-verma·40m ago

Karan, shutting down the metro definitely made things hard, but would a meeting with leaders actually change anything?

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR
Chamar no WhatsApp