Top Court Orders CBI and Trial Judge to Secure Appearance of Key Witnesses in Manipur Assault TrialManipur
5 Oct 2026, 5:54 pm (25 min ago)· 0

Top Court Orders CBI and Trial Judge to Secure Appearance of Key Witnesses in Manipur Assault Trial

The Supreme Court has instructed the CBI and the trial court to ensure two primary victim-witnesses appear for examination in the Manipur sexual violence trial, stressing that witness safety remains the state's responsibility.

The Supreme Court has directed the Central Bureau of Investigation and the designated trial court to ensure that two central victim-witnesses in the Manipur sexual violence matter appear without delay for examination, emphasising that proceedings must advance swiftly. The directive underlines the judicial urgency surrounding one of the most widely scrutinised cases to emerge from the ethnic turmoil that hit the northeastern state.

Bail Cancellation Plea and Witness Intimidation Concerns

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V Mohana issued the directions during the hearing of petitions filed by the CBI seeking the cancellation of bail granted to two accused persons. Additional Solicitor General D P Singh, representing the investigative agency, raised alarms over witness vulnerability, submitting that the presence of the accused on bail could directly impede the victims' confidence to step forward and testify. Reminding the court of the trial's commencement, the law officer stated that the victims had been subjected to horrific sexual violence before being paraded and filmed.

Also read

Defence Arguments on Trial Pace and Reasons for Absences

Senior advocate Shadan Farasat, appearing on behalf of one of the accused, countered the agency's stance by arguing that the CBI had failed to conduct the prosecution at an adequate pace. He pointed out to the judges that the case involves around 30 witnesses and the matter is currently at its second stage of proceedings. During the exchange, Justice Bagchi questioned why the victim-witnesses had not appeared for examination on the scheduled dates.

Advocate Nizam Pasha, representing the victim-complainant, clarified the circumstances surrounding the absence, informing the bench that the prior hearing had fallen on a public holiday when the designated centres where the victims were scheduled to depose remained closed. He further apprised the bench that one of the victims was bedridden with dengue. Addressing these submissions, the Chief Justice remarked that victims cannot be expected to appear when hearings coincide with public holidays, while instructing the authorities to ensure that at least one of the two witnesses is present for examination on the upcoming hearing date.

State Duty on Witness Protection and Bail Re-examination

In response to the prosecution's argument that no witness would testify if the accused remain at large, the Chief Justice affirmed that safeguarding witnesses remains an institutional obligation resting squarely with the authorities. The bench underscored that witness protection is a responsibility the administration must deliver on without excuses. CJI Kant added that the court would scrutinise the question of bail if there is any indication that the accused are misusing their liberty. The bench further observed that it would be appropriate to decide the bail cancellation petitions once the examination of both victim-witnesses has concluded.

Broader Oversight of Manipur Ethnic Clashes

The latest hearing forms part of the Supreme Court's broader ongoing monitoring of legal proceedings emerging from the ethnic strife that erupted in Manipur in 2023. On September 17, the same bench had expressed sharp concern regarding fatalities reported inside relief centres housing internally displaced persons. The judges had directed the Manipur chief secretary to report back on the concrete measures initiated to investigate those deaths, pursue criminal accountability, and secure the living conditions of camp residents.

Additionally, the apex court had advised the state governments of Manipur and Assam along with relevant authorities to explore establishing two dedicated special trial courts to exclusively handle cases probed by the CBI and the National Investigation Agency linked to the unrest. The ethnic violence initially broke out on May 3, 2023, following a tribal solidarity procession organised in opposition to the Meitei community's demand for Scheduled Tribe classification. Since then, hundreds of individuals have lost their lives and thousands more have been displaced from their homes.

Questions & Answers

What specific directions did the Supreme Court issue to the CBI and the trial court?
The Supreme Court directed them to ensure that two key victim-witnesses appear for examination and that the trial moves forward expeditiously.
Which bench presided over this hearing?
The matter was heard by a bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V Mohana.
Why were the victim-witnesses unable to appear during the earlier hearing?
The previous date fell on a public holiday causing deposition centres to be closed, and one of the victims was suffering from dengue.
What argument did the CBI make to seek cancellation of the accused persons' bail?
The CBI argued that the accused being out on bail could adversely affect the witnesses' willingness to depose.
What did the Chief Justice observe regarding witness protection?
The Chief Justice stated that protecting witnesses is an obligation resting entirely with the authorities.
When will the Supreme Court take up the pleas to cancel the accused's bail?
The bench indicated that it would be appropriate to consider the bail cancellation pleas once both key victim-witnesses have been examined.
How many witnesses are involved in this case according to the defence?
Counsel for one of the accused stated that there are around 30 witnesses and proceedings are currently at the second stage.
When did the ethnic violence in Manipur originally begin?
Ethnic violence broke out in Manipur on May 3, 2023, following a tribal solidarity march opposing the Meitei community's demand for Scheduled Tribe status.

Comments 0

No comments yet — be the first.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR
Chamar no WhatsApp