India Rejects US Lawmaker Riley Moore's Remarks on FCRA Amendments, MEA Says Parliament Holds Sole AuthorityIndia
7 Aug 2026, 6:49 pm (9 hours ago)· 2

India Rejects US Lawmaker Riley Moore's Remarks on FCRA Amendments, MEA Says Parliament Holds Sole Authority

MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal clarified that FCRA amendments are India's internal matter and that Parliament holds sole authority over legislative decisions.

India's Ministry of External Affairs has responded firmly to recent comments from US lawmakers regarding proposed changes to the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA). Official spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal made it clear that matters related to Indian legislation fall strictly within the domain of domestic sovereignty, where decisions are made exclusively by the Parliament of India.

Sovereignty and International Regulations on Foreign Funding

Addressing questions raised by American politicians regarding the proposed FCRA amendments, Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal noted that the government has observed the comments circulating on the subject. Emphasizing national jurisdiction, Randhir Jaiswal stated, "Legislative matters related to India are our internal affairs, on which the Parliament of India takes decisions."

Furthermore, Jaiswal pointed out that regulating foreign financial inflows is not unique to India. He emphasized that several sovereign nations around the globe, including the United States itself, enforce regulatory mechanisms to oversee and control the movement of foreign funds into their domestic jurisdictions.

Statements by US Lawmaker Riley M. Moore

The response from New Delhi follows public comments made on social media platform X by US Lawmaker Riley M. Moore. In his post, Moore referenced the deep historical roots of Christianity in the region, noting that St. Thomas the Apostle arrived on the Malabar coast merely a few decades after the resurrection of Jesus Christ. He asserted that despite this long-standing presence, proposed modifications to the Foreign Contribution Regulation Amendment rules would enable the government to take control of local churches and religious charitable institutions.

Labeling the legislative measure as "a direct attack on Christians," the American politician cautioned that if the bill continues along its current trajectory without modification, it could emerge as a major area of concern within bilateral relations between the United States and India.

Also read

Questions & Answers

What did MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal say about the FCRA bill?
Randhir Jaiswal stated that legislative matters in India are internal affairs and that decisions are made exclusively by the Parliament of India.
What concerns were raised by US Lawmaker Riley M. Moore regarding FCRA?
Riley M. Moore claimed the amendments would allow the Indian government to take control of churches and religious charities, calling it an attack on Christians.
How did India respond to claims about foreign funding regulations?
India highlighted that regulating foreign funding inflows is a common international practice followed by many countries, including the US.
What did Riley M. Moore say about the historical background of Christianity in India?
He noted that Christians have been in India since St. Thomas the Apostle arrived on the Malabar coast a few decades after the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Comments 0

No comments yet — be the first.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR