Supreme Court Declines Urgent Hearing on 700 Percent Spike in Festival AirfaresIndia
2 Nov 2026, 4:02 pm (2 hours ago)· 0

Supreme Court Declines Urgent Hearing on 700 Percent Spike in Festival Airfares

The Supreme Court has turned down a plea seeking an immediate hearing against a massive surge in airline ticket prices during Diwali and Chhath. During the mention, the bench remarked that passengers could choose not to fly if fares were excessively high.

The Supreme Court of India has refused an urgent hearing on an oral mention raising alarm over sharp surges in airline ticket prices during the festive season. When an advocate urged the bench to urgently step in against ticket prices multiplying rapidly ahead of major festivals, pointing to a massive hike, the judges declined immediate intervention and made a direct oral observation that travelers could avoid air journeys instead.

Urgent Mention Before the Three-Judge Bench

The matter was brought up for early listing before a bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, and Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh. Urging the court to intervene without delay, the advocate submitted that flight fares on high-demand routes had witnessed an increase of nearly 700 percent. In response to this submission, the bench remarked:

Also read
Do not travel by air.

The advocate contended that air travel functions as an essential utility for citizens in modern transportation networks. The counsel argued that allowing commercial carriers to impose such uncontrolled increases during high-traffic windows amounts to an infringement of the fundamental right to equality before the law guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution.

Pending Regulatory Petitions and Judicial Scrutiny

The issue of unmonitored airfares is already undergoing formal legal examination in a separate public petition filed by social activist S. Lakshminarayanan. That broader petition seeks systemic reforms across the commercial aviation market, emphasizing greater operational transparency and stronger passenger safeguards. It requests the creation of an independent and robust regulatory mechanism to govern erratic fee revisions, ancillary charges, and sudden price spikes levied by private airlines.

The Supreme Court had issued notices seeking responses from the Union government and other aviation authorities in November of the preceding year. During a hearing held in January, the bench underscored its intent to step in against arbitrary price escalations. The court had voiced serious concern over excessive holiday tariffs, terming excessive airfare hikes as exploitation, and directed both the central government and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to put their official positions on record.

Implementation of the Bharatiya Vayu Yan Adhiniyam, 2024

During the proceedings held on October 16 regarding Lakshminarayanan's plea, the central government submitted that necessary statutory framework updates were moving forward. Government representatives informed the bench that rules formulated under the Bharatiya Vayu Yan Adhiniyam, 2024, designed to overhaul the national aviation sector, had received administrative clearance and were slated for official gazette publication within two weeks.

Taking note of the government's stand, the bench instructed Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to present the finalized and published rules before the court at the upcoming hearing scheduled for November 16. Earlier, on August 17, the Union government had apprised the apex court that the administrative process to formulate rules for modernizing the country's aviation industry under the new statute had been expedited.

Questions & Answers

What did the Supreme Court state regarding the plea against a 700 percent hike in airfares?
The apex court declined an urgent hearing and orally observed that travelers could choose not to fly if fares were too high.
Which judges formed the bench hearing the urgent mention?
The matter was mentioned before a three-judge bench consisting of Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, and Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh.
What constitutional ground did the advocate raise against the fare surge?
The counsel contended that air travel is an essential service and that unmonitored price increases breach the right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.
What update did the central government provide regarding aviation regulations?
On October 16, the Union government stated that draft rules under the Bharatiya Vayu Yan Adhiniyam, 2024, had secured administrative approval and were nearing publication.
When is the scheduled date for the next hearing on the aviation rules?
The Supreme Court directed Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to present the published aviation rules before the bench on November 16.

Comments 4

Arjun Mehta@arjun-mehta·1h ago

Just don't fly if it's too expensive? How is anyone supposed to travel now?

Divya Reddy@divya-reddy·1h ago

You are so right, Arjun. Last year I had to pay triple the price to go home for Chhath, it completely emptied my pockets.

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·1h ago

Saying people shouldn't travel if fares are high feels a bit detached, going home for festivals is a necessity for many.

Ravikash Gupta@ravikash·1h ago

Karan, people have to travel for festivals, that's true, but the court's hands are tied here. A separate case on airline regulation is already ongoing, so maybe relief will come from there.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR
Chamar no WhatsApp