Akhilesh Yadav posted on X, the social media platform, throwing a direct challenge at the government to resign immediately after fresh fraud surfaced in the NEET examination. In his post, he described the incident not as an isolated failure but as proof of a coordinated scheme, one in which he alleged that those responsible had arrived prepared, and that collusion made the entire operation possible.
Pointing the Finger at the BJP Gang
In the post, Akhilesh Yadav alleged that the latest NEET fraud shows what he called the BJP gang came this time wearing a new disguise, specifically to solve papers on behalf of someone else. He argued that such a scheme could only be pulled off because complicity ran from the very bottom to the very top of the system, making it far more than a routine lapse and pointing instead to a deep, structural breakdown.
Biometric Verification Was Also Tampered With
Yadav went further, alleging that even the biometric verification process, which exists to confirm candidate identities and prevent impersonation, was subjected to manipulation in this case. According to him, it was precisely this tampering with the verification safeguard that allowed those behind the fraud to carry out their operation without being caught, keeping the entire racket hidden until it came to light.
One Place Caught, Many More Suspected
Yadav also raised a broader concern in his post, pointing out that this is just one place where the matter has come out in the open. He questioned how many more exam centres may have seen similar fraud that nobody has yet uncovered, suggesting that what has been exposed is likely only a fraction of a much wider problem spread across multiple locations.
Public Reaction
The post ignited sharp debate on social media, with some users backing Yadav's call for accountability and pressing for stronger safeguards in how national examinations are conducted. A number of others, however, questioned the political framing of the issue, raising concerns about the role of various states and political parties and arguing that responsibility for enabling such fraud goes beyond any single party or institution.
