School Hijab Verdict Triggers UP Political Feud as OP Rajbhar Challenges Akhilesh YadavPolitics
25 Aug 2026, 1:38 pm (2 hours ago)· 2

School Hijab Verdict Triggers UP Political Feud as OP Rajbhar Challenges Akhilesh Yadav

Following the Allahabad High Court's dismissal of a petition seeking permission to wear a hijab with school uniform, UP Minister OP Rajbhar has publicly called on Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav to clarify his stance on the ruling.

Political tensions in Uttar Pradesh escalated after the Allahabad High Court affirmed the primacy of institutional dress codes and rejected a petition seeking permission to wear a hijab in school. Shortly after the ruling was delivered, Cabinet Minister OP Rajbhar targeted Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav, demanding that he publicly declare his position on the judicial outcome.

Allahabad High Court Mandates Compliance with School Uniform Rules

A division bench comprising Justice JJ Munir and Justice Indrajit Shukla ruled that students must strictly adhere to the dress codes established by educational institutions. In dismissing the petition, the bench observed that the petitioner failed to present sufficient religious evidence establishing that wearing a headscarf inside a school is an essential practice of Islam.

Also read

Details of the Petition and the Student Involved

The case originated from Tagore Public School under the Attarsuiya police station area in Prayagraj. Student Sukaina Rizvi, acting through her mother, had filed the petition after completing her tenth-grade examinations and applying for admission into the eleventh grade at the same institution. The bench noted that consistent judicial consensus maintains that wearing a hijab is not an obligatory tenet of the Islamic faith and that omitting it does not compromise personal belief.

Judicial Precedent: Reference to 2022 Karnataka High Court Verdict

While delivering the judgment, the Allahabad High Court explicitly cited the 2022 decision of the Karnataka High Court, which similarly concluded that wearing a hijab does not constitute an essential religious practice in Islam. The judges noted that no valid legal grounds were established in the present matter to take a divergent view from the precedent set by the Karnataka court.

Minister OP Rajbhar Questions Akhilesh Yadav over Verdict Response

Following the court's announcement, Cabinet Minister OP Rajbhar posted a message on the social media platform X directly questioning Akhilesh Yadav. Rajbhar pointed out that Samajwadi Party spokespersons were openly opposing the verdict and asked whether Yadav himself intended to take a stand against the decision of the High Court. He urged the opposition leader to break his silence and clearly state his stance regarding school dress codes and headscarves.

Questions & Answers

What did the Allahabad High Court rule on the hijab petition?
The Allahabad High Court dismissed the petition seeking permission to wear a hijab with school uniform, holding that institutional dress code rules are mandatory.
Which school and student were involved in this case?
The case involved Sukaina Rizvi, a student of Tagore Public School located in Attarsuiya, Prayagraj, who filed the plea through her mother.
What legal reasoning did the bench give regarding the headscarf?
The court stated that the petitioner failed to prove that wearing a headscarf is an essential religious practice in Islam.
Which earlier judicial precedent was cited in the ruling?
The bench referenced the 2022 Karnataka High Court judgment, which had ruled that wearing a hijab is not essential to Islamic religious practice.
What challenge did OP Rajbhar issue to Akhilesh Yadav?
Cabinet Minister OP Rajbhar challenged Akhilesh Yadav to clarify his position and state whether he opposes the High Court's ruling on school uniforms.

Comments 2

Ravikash Gupta@ravikash·34m ago

This Allahabad High Court ruling and the subsequent political fallout could impact Uttar Pradesh's socio-economic fabric. Heightened polarization from such judicial outcomes and political rhetoric affects consumer markets, local business sentiment, and investor confidence. Increased political uncertainty often prompts corporate entities and market analysts to adopt a cautious stance.

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·34m ago

This Allahabad High Court ruling and the ensuing political rhetoric have introduced fresh challenges to law enforcement and public order. From a crime reporting perspective, it is evident that when judicial decisions involving educational institutions trigger sharp political reactions, maintaining ground-level security becomes highly sensitive for local police and administration. Such situations consistently risk adverse impacts on public safety due to inflammatory statements, requiring heightened vigilance from security agencies.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR