Securing a rental property in a major city like Mumbai is notoriously difficult. Typically, landlords verify a prospective tenant's professional background, income levels, family details, and personal identification. However, a recent incident has left many stunned. According to a viral video circulating on social media, a woman who went to view an apartment was not asked for her contact number or identity proof, but rather for her personal numerology number. Upon calculating her number based on her birth date and comparing it with the apartment's number, the landlady refused to rent the place out, citing an incompatibility. This event has ignited an intense discussion online, with opinions split between those defending personal beliefs and others criticizing the decision as irrational.
The Discussion Begins Online
The matter came to light after an artist and social media influencer, Vagmita Singh, shared a video on her Instagram account. She recounted the experience of a friend who had gone to inspect an apartment. During the meeting, the landlady asked her, What is your number? Initially, the friend assumed it was a standard request for a mobile number, only to realize later that the inquiry was strictly focused on the tenets of numerology.
Refusal Based on Numerology
According to the video, the landlady calculated the woman's numerology number using her birth date. She then explained that the apartment was associated with the number 4, while the woman’s personal number was 7. The landlady asserted that these two numbers were not compatible with each other, and therefore, she could not proceed with the rental agreement. The video expressed disbelief, highlighting how unusual such a requirement is in the context of finding housing.
Internet Reaction
Following the video's viral spread, thousands of users voiced their reactions. Some joked that the combination of 4 and 7 is actually considered auspicious in many circles, suggesting the landlady missed out on a good tenant. Others argued that, according to their interpretation of numerology, the pair would have been quite strong. Conversely, a significant portion of the audience criticized the incident, arguing that housing decisions should be based on logic rather than subjective, personal beliefs. While some users found the story amusing, others expressed concern over the trend of such arbitrary rules.
Previous Anecdotes
In response to the viral post, several users shared their own unusual housing experiences. One user recounted meeting a landlord who would strictly refuse to interact with anyone even a minute before or after a specific time, waiting solely for an auspicious moment. The user described feeling that many aspects of the interaction were bizarre, leading them to quickly abandon the idea of renting that place.
Is This a Universal Practice?
It is important to note that this incident is based on a single viral social media post and should not be viewed as a standard practice across the rental market. Generally, landlords prioritize practical criteria such as the tenant's ability to pay rent on time, their job, identification, and family background. While some individuals do base their decisions on private, personal beliefs, this cannot be considered a common occurrence in the broader rental landscape.
Why Did This Become a Subject of Debate?
This incident captured public attention because renters already face numerous stringent conditions when seeking accommodation. Introducing numerology as a criterion felt novel and, to many, quite absurd. This uniqueness is precisely why the video gained rapid traction, prompting people to share their diverse perspectives on the boundaries of personal beliefs in professional housing agreements.
