Bagaha murder accused acquitted after three years in jail due to lack of evidenceBihar
8 Sept 2026, 9:10 pm (1 hour ago)· 2

Bagaha murder accused acquitted after three years in jail due to lack of evidence

A quarrel over a single pinch of chewing tobacco in Bagaha, Bihar had turned into a murder case, but the accused, Kalimuddin Gaddi, has been acquitted after three years in jail as the court found insufficient evidence.

A quarrel over a single pinch of chewing tobacco in Bagaha, in Bihar's West Champaran district, had spiralled into a murder case three years ago. Now the case has taken a decisive turn, the Bagaha civil court has acquitted the accused, Kalimuddin Gaddi, citing a lack of solid evidence. The court of District and Additional Sessions Judge IV Manvendra Mishra completed the hearing and granted the accused the benefit of the doubt before acquitting him.

A fight that began over a pinch of tobacco

According to police, the case is linked to a killing that took place around three years ago in Khalwa Patti village, under the Dhanha police station area of the district. As per the prosecution, Nazir Gaddi filed a complaint at Dhanha police station on 4 September 2023, accusing others of assaulting his 35 year old son, Gulab Gaddi. The complaint stated that the dispute between the two sides began over something as small as a single pinch of khaini, tobacco, but it quickly escalated.

Also read

Alleged screwdriver attack on the neck, but postmortem found no confirmation

Per the FIR, once the argument turned into a scuffle, Kalimuddin allegedly struck Gulab Gaddi's neck with a screwdriver. That single alleged blow is what pushed the case into murder charges, and police named Kalimuddin as the accused. However, the postmortem examination conducted during the investigation did not confirm the claim of a screwdriver attack on the neck, a gap that weakened the prosecution's case from the outset.

Several witnesses retracted their statements during the trial

Once the trial got underway, things did not go smoothly for the prosecution. During the hearing, several witnesses went back on the statements they had originally given, while a few were declared hostile altogether. As a result, the prosecution could not produce sufficient, solid evidence before the court to establish the murder charge against the accused. Citing this very shortage of evidence, the court gave Kalimuddin Gaddi the benefit of the doubt and acquitted him.

Freedom after nearly three years behind bars

Kalimuddin Gaddi spent close to three years in jail in connection with the murder case before the court's verdict finally set him free. The court made clear that the prosecution had failed to gather evidence strong enough to prove the allegations, and that shortfall is what tipped the verdict in the accused's favour. In the aftermath of the ruling, local residents have begun questioning the way police and the investigating agency handled the case, arguing that a stronger investigation from the start might have produced a different outcome.

Questions & Answers

What triggered this dispute?
The dispute began over an argument involving a single pinch of khaini, chewing tobacco.
When and where did the incident take place?
The incident took place about three years ago in Khalwa Patti village, under the Dhanha police station area of Bagaha.
Who was the accused?
The accused was Kalimuddin Gaddi.
What was he accused of?
He was accused of striking Gulab Gaddi's neck with a screwdriver, leading to a murder charge.
Why did the court acquit him?
The court acquitted him because the prosecution failed to produce sufficient evidence and several witnesses retracted their statements during the trial.
How long was the accused in jail?
Kalimuddin Gaddi spent close to three years in jail.
Who filed the original complaint?
Nazir Gaddi filed the complaint, alleging that his 35 year old son, Gulab Gaddi, was assaulted.
Which court delivered the verdict?
The court of District and Additional Sessions Judge IV Manvendra Mishra delivered the verdict.

Comments 2

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·49m ago

This case highlights a major flaw in the criminal justice system where conviction rates drop due to shoddy investigation and hostile witnesses. Spending three years behind bars without solid evidence over a petty dispute and ultimately walking free proves that police and prosecution need to rely more heavily on scientific evidence to prevent prolonged incarceration of individuals and ensure accountability.

Rohan Verma@rohan-verma·49m ago

This case reflects a deeper systemic flaw in our criminal justice process where shoddy investigation and hostile witnesses undermine accountability. Spending three years behind bars without conclusive evidence before an acquittal raises serious concerns about police protocols and investigative rigor. A stronger reliance on forensic evidence from the outset is essential to prevent such prolonged pre-trial incarceration.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR