Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes Down Sukhu Government's VC Appointment Rules for Agricultural Universities as UnconstitutionalHimachal Pradesh
28 Aug 2026, 11:49 am (1 hour ago)· 2

Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes Down Sukhu Government's VC Appointment Rules for Agricultural Universities as Unconstitutional

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has invalidated amended state rules giving the Sukhu government a decisive say in Vice Chancellor appointments at agricultural universities, ordering fresh recruitment under UGC guidelines.

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has delivered a significant setback to the state government by striking down legal provisions that granted the administration overriding authority in appointing Vice Chancellors at state agricultural and forestry universities. The court observed that the modified regulations violated the mandatory provisions established under the University Grants Commission (UGC) Regulations, 2018.

High Court Ruling on UGC Compliance

A Division Bench comprising Justice Vivek Singh Thakur and Justice Ranjan Sharma issued the ruling while allowing writ petitions filed by Narendra Kumar Sankhyan and Sanjeev Kumar Chauhan. The petitioners had challenged the altered selection procedure enacted by the state. The bench declared the Himachal Pradesh Universities of Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry (Amendment) Act, 2023, its 2025 amendment, and the rules framed in 2026 unconstitutional and void ab initio.

Also read

Directives for Affected Universities

The High Court verdict directly impacts two premier state institutions: Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya located in Palampur, and Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry situated in Solan. The division bench directed the authorities to initiate a fresh selection process for Vice Chancellors in both universities strictly adhering to the selection criteria mandated by the UGC 2018 framework.

Background of the Controversy and 2026 Notification

Both universities had been functioning without permanent Vice Chancellors for an extended period. To resolve the vacancy issue while retaining decisive control over final appointments, the Sukhu administration modified the governing state legislation. Subsequently, in February 2026, the state government issued advertisements to fill the Vice Chancellor positions under the newly amended rules, which were promptly challenged before the High Court for bypassing central educational standards.

Questions & Answers

What decision of the Sukhu government was struck down by the Himachal Pradesh High Court?
The court invalidated state amendments and rules that gave the government a decisive role in appointing Vice Chancellors at state agricultural universities.
Which universities are impacted by this ruling?
The ruling applies to Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya in Palampur and Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry in Solan.
Which specific laws were declared unconstitutional by the court?
The court declared the Himachal Pradesh Universities of Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry (Amendment) Act 2023, its 2025 amendment, and 2026 rules as unconstitutional and void ab initio.
Who were the judges on the Division Bench?
The Division Bench comprised Justice Vivek Singh Thakur and Justice Ranjan Sharma.
What directives were given for future Vice Chancellor appointments?
The High Court ordered the immediate initiation of a fresh selection process strictly in accordance with UGC Regulations, 2018.

Comments 2

Rohan Verma@rohan-verma·39m ago

This ruling marks a major milestone in the ongoing friction between the autonomy of higher education institutions and state-level administrative control. The Himachal Pradesh High Court's absolute prioritization of the 2018 UGC regulations demonstrates that political interference in academic appointments can be legally curbed through central standards. With the Sukhu administration's amendments declared void, it is now established that the future selection processes for both the Palampur and Solan universities will strictly align with regulatory norms, leaving little room for arbitrary legislative tinkering by state authorities in academic matters.

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·39m ago

This legal setback is not merely an administrative shuffle, but a clear breach of statutory and constitutional boundaries. The court's declaration of the acts and rules as 'void ab initio' underscores that central UGC standards cannot be sidelined in legislative frameworks. With the High Court issuing strict directives, the government will face intense scrutiny regarding the legal validity of the fresh selection process in both universities, setting a robust legal benchmark for all future academic appointments.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR