Delhi Court Issues Fresh Summons to YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in Defamation LawsuitIndia
15 Oct 2026, 6:11 am (1 hour ago)· 0

Delhi Court Issues Fresh Summons to YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in Defamation Lawsuit

A Delhi court has ordered a fresh summons to YouTuber Dhruv Rathee at his Gurugram residence in connection with a 2018 criminal defamation complaint. The directive came during hearings on a plea filed by BJP IT cell member Vikas Pandey.

Legal complications have escalated for YouTuber Dhruv Rathee following an order by a Delhi court directing the issuance of fresh summons against him in a criminal defamation suit dating back to 2018. Rathee is currently visiting India, having made recent appearances alongside CJP figure Abhijeet Dipke and being detained ahead of a protest at Jantar Mantar. Following that detention, he now faces renewed judicial scrutiny in the pending litigation.

Court Order on Plea by BJP IT Cell Member

The directive was passed by Judicial Magistrate Rahul Jain during the hearing of an application moved by Vikas Pandey, a member of the BJP IT cell. Pandey had approached the bench seeking fresh summons against Rathee. Advocate Samaksh Sharma, appearing on behalf of the complainant, informed the magistrate that Rathee generally resides in Austria but is presently in India to participate in demonstrations staged by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) across the national capital. The counsel argued that fresh process was imperative so immediate measures could be executed while Rathee is within the country.

Also read

Chronology of Summons and Austria Residence

In its formal order dated October 12, the court observed that court records establish persistent attempts by the complainant over multiple years to serve summons upon accused number one, Dhruv Rathee. The judicial magistrate noted that Rathee has lived in Austria for the past seven years and returned to India primarily to join the ongoing demonstrations in New Delhi. The magistrate recalled that the court had initially issued summons to Rathee back in July 2019. Taking these circumstances into account, the court directed the registry to dispatch fresh summons to Rathee's residential address located in Gurugram, Haryana.

Defamation Case Triggered by 2018 Video

The origins of the legal battle trace back to 2018, when Vikas Pandey filed a defamation action against the social media creator. The litigation was initiated after Rathee published a video on his YouTube channel containing allegations directed at Pandey. That legal proceeding, stalled across multiple years due to service issues, has now regained momentum with the court directing physical delivery of the legal notice at his Haryana residence.

Questions & Answers

What order did the Delhi court issue regarding Dhruv Rathee?
The court ordered that fresh summons be dispatched to Dhruv Rathee at his residential address in Gurugram, Haryana.
Who instituted the defamation case against Dhruv Rathee?
The complaint was filed in 2018 by Vikas Pandey, an active member of the BJP IT cell.
What was the original dispute that led to this litigation?
Vikas Pandey took legal action alleging that Rathee uploaded a defamatory video concerning him on his YouTube channel.
When did the court first issue summons in this matter?
According to the judicial magistrate, the court initially issued summons to Rathee in July 2019.
Why did the complainant request a fresh summons at this time?
Counsel submitted that Rathee had traveled from Austria to India to join protests in New Delhi, making immediate service actionable.

Comments 5

Meera Joshi@meera-joshi·11m ago

Old legal troubles just keep following around. It is always tricky to serve summons when someone lives abroad, but now that he is visiting the country, things are moving fast in court.

Arjun Mehta@arjun-mehta·31m ago

A fresh summons is issued in a seven-year-old case now, while he is currently right here in Delhi.

Ravikash Gupta@ravikash·30m ago

Spot on, Arjun. When I was running around that Gurugram address back in 2019 trying to track paperwork, I realized seven years is just too long to wait.

Rohan Verma@rohan-verma·56m ago

He dodged summons for seven years, and now that he's back in India, the court swiftly issued a fresh notice to his Gurugram address.

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·56m ago

Spot on, Rohan. When I visited the Gurugram court during an old reporting assignment myself, I saw how tricky it is to serve summons in cases involving people abroad.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR
Chamar no WhatsApp