Supreme Court Declines to Revisit Order Quashing Jantar Mantar FIRs, CJI Says Students Should Not Be Tied Down in Legal EntanglementsIndia
9 Oct 2026, 1:24 pm (2 hours ago)· 0

Supreme Court Declines to Revisit Order Quashing Jantar Mantar FIRs, CJI Says Students Should Not Be Tied Down in Legal Entanglements

The Supreme Court has refused to hear a plea challenging the dismissal of FIRs linked to the July CJP protest at Jantar Mantar, with CJI Surya Kant stressing that young students must not face endless courtroom visits.

The Supreme Court has declined to entertain a petition challenging its decision to quash police complaints arising from the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) demonstration at Jantar Mantar in July. The plea had urged the bench to order an impartial investigation into the First Information Reports registered following the protest. During the proceedings, CJI Surya Kant observed that those facing legal scrutiny are young students whose careers and families must be kept in mind. The Chief Justice remarked that the bench does not want these youngsters trapped in long-drawn legal procedures or forced to make repeated rounds of courtrooms.

Arguments in Court and Precedents of Relief

Appearing for the petitioner, counsel argued before the bench that a strong message needed to be sent across society that courts cannot be treated as personal property and that legal compliance is mandatory. The petition maintained that the judicial order cancelling the criminal cases was erroneous.

Also read

In response, CJI Surya Kant pointed out that the Supreme Court has previously struck down criminal cases across different situations. The Chief Justice highlighted instances where cases arising from demonstrations by Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies, as well as protests staged during the Covid pandemic restrictions, were cancelled by the court. In those instances, relief was granted because the individuals involved were not habitual offenders. CJI Surya Kant noted that the present petition was essentially seeking a review of the court's earlier ruling, leading the bench to dismiss the matter without further hearing.

Central Government Assurances and Sonam Wangchuk Fast

The controversy dates back to a protest movement where the Central Government took an accommodating position regarding cases against citizens holding peaceful demonstrations at Jantar Mantar and those joining the march to Parliament on July 20.

Sonam Wangchuk had undertaken a hunger strike at Jantar Mantar beginning on June 28. He subsequently broke his fast at Medanta Hospital in the presence of Union Minister JP Nadda and Union Minister Jitendra Singh. During those developments, the Central Government extended an assurance to Wangchuk that peaceful student demonstrators would not face punitive action. The authorities also committed that the criminal complaints registered against the protesting youths would be withdrawn.

Permission Denied for Fresh Protest on October 10

In a related development, the Cockroach Janata Party has been refused police clearance to stage another protest at Jantar Mantar scheduled for October 10. The law enforcement authorities have clarified the operational reasons behind turning down the application.

Joint CP Nupur Prasad stated that the outfit had moved a representation before the New Delhi district authorities on October 7. In that plea, the party indicated its intention to stage a demonstration on the 10th regarding the accountability of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), though local authorities decided against permitting the assembly.

Questions & Answers

What did the Supreme Court rule regarding the Jantar Mantar FIRs?
The Supreme Court declined to hear a petition challenging its decision to quash the FIRs registered during the July CJP protest at Jantar Mantar.
What remarks did CJI Surya Kant make regarding the students?
CJI Surya Kant stated that the court does not want young students to get tangled in legal proceedings and face continuous rounds of courtrooms.
Which legal precedents were cited by the Chief Justice?
The Chief Justice cited instances where cases against lawmakers during sit-ins and protesters during Covid restrictions were quashed since they were not habitual offenders.
When and where did Sonam Wangchuk end his hunger strike?
Sonam Wangchuk ended his fast, which began on June 28, at Medanta Hospital in the presence of Union Ministers JP Nadda and Jitendra Singh.
Why was CJP denied permission for its October 10 protest?
Joint CP Nupur Prasad stated that CJP applied on October 7 to demonstrate against Chief Election Commissioner accountability on October 10, but clearance was denied.

Comments 2

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·1h ago

Reminds me of covering those students protesting at Jantar Mantar. Such a huge relief from the court, otherwise these kids would have lost their entire future to unending court cases.

Arjun Mehta@arjun-mehta·1h ago

Spot on, Karan. Showing such a human approach during parliamentary matters is essential so these youngsters can build their futures.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR
Chamar no WhatsApp