Plea Seeking FIR Against Nishu And Sanjay Azad Over Offensive Posts Listed Before Patiala House CourtPunjab
22 Sept 2026, 4:50 pm (1 hour ago)· 0

Plea Seeking FIR Against Nishu And Sanjay Azad Over Offensive Posts Listed Before Patiala House Court

A petition seeking an FIR against Nishu Azad and Sanjay Azad for alleged objectionable online remarks regarding Hindu deities is set to be heard at Delhi's Patiala House Court.

A legal petition seeking the registration of a criminal case against Nishu Azad and his father Sanjay Azad has reached the Patiala House Court in Delhi over allegedly objectionable social media remarks targeted at Hindu deities. The matter has been formally placed before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, with proceedings scheduled for hearing on September 23, 2026.

Supreme Court Advocate Moved Court After Police Complaint

The judicial action follows an initiative taken by Amita Sachdeva, an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court. Prior to moving the court, she had submitted a formal complaint on September 5 at the New Delhi District Cyber Police Station requesting that an FIR be lodged against both individuals. The petitioner approached the magisterial court after the police authorities did not initiate the expected action on the complaint.

Also read

According to the petition, derogatory and offensive material was posted through Nishu Azad's social media handle targeting revered Hindu figures. The plea specifically cites posts that allegedly made controversial references to Lord Shiva, Lord Krishna, Goddess Saraswati, and Goddess Durga.

Invocation of BNS Sections on Communal Harmony

The petitioner has sought legal action under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) along with relevant provisions of the Information Technology Act. The primary invoking includes Section 196 of the BNS, which deals with promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, and Section 299, which penalises deliberate acts intended to outrage religious feelings.

Furthermore, reference has also been made to Section 353 of the BNS within the legal submission. The core focus of the allegations, however, remains centered on the contentious social media output and the resulting hurt to religious sentiments. Whether these penal sections will be formally applied depends on the forthcoming judicial review and police assessment.

Preservation of Digital Footprints and IP Logs

Highlighting the critical role of electronic data in cyber offences, the application urges the court to ensure the immediate preservation of digital materials. This includes securing the exact social media posts, platform records, associated IP logs, and corresponding technical metadata.

The plea highlights that preserving these electronic footprints without delay is vital for any subsequent investigation, preventing potential deletion, tampering, or loss of primary electronic evidence before the court evaluates the matter further.

Questions & Answers

Against whom has the petition been filed in Patiala House Court?
The plea has been filed against Nishu Azad and his father Sanjay Azad over allegedly derogatory social media posts.
Which deities are specifically referenced in the complaint?
The petition points to contentious posts concerning Lord Shiva, Lord Krishna, Goddess Saraswati, and Goddess Durga.
When is the matter scheduled for hearing in court?
The hearing is listed before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Patiala House Court on September 23, 2026.
Under which sections has the petitioner demanded an FIR?
The application seeks an FIR under BNS Sections 196, 299, and 353, alongside relevant provisions of the IT Act.
When was the initial complaint submitted to the police?
The complainant originally approached the New Delhi District Cyber Police Station on September 5.

Comments 5

Nyra Kaif@nyra-kaif·23m ago

Saying anything on social media just for likes and views while hurting religious sentiments has become way too common. Unless strict legal action is taken in such cases, this nonsense is never going to stop.

Ravikash Gupta@ravikash·47m ago

Online comments on deities have now reached the courts. I remember last year when an acquaintance filed a complaint over an offensive post online and had to run from pillar to post at police stations.

Arjun Mehta@arjun-mehta·47m ago

Ravikash ji, when police don't register an FIR, moving court is the only way. Asking to preserve IP logs will definitely make the probe stronger.

Rohan Verma@rohan-verma·1h ago

Good to see courts acting fast on requests to preserve digital evidence in such cases before posts get deleted.

Karan Malhotra@karan-malhotra·1h ago

Rohan, I've personally seen cases in cyber cells where missing IP logs let suspects walk free if not saved in time.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR
Chamar no WhatsApp