Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar in Muzaffarnagar Says Death is Better Than Being Called a CowardUttar Pradesh
8 Sept 2026, 4:33 pm (1 hour ago)· 2

Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar in Muzaffarnagar Says Death is Better Than Being Called a Coward

A sessions judge in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, sentenced a man to death in a dowry murder case, declaring that he prefers death over yielding to criminal pressure.

A firm judicial stand has emerged from Muzaffarnagar in Uttar Pradesh, where Additional District and Sessions Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar delivered a death sentence in a dowry murder case while firmly rejecting any intimidation from criminal elements. The judge asserted that he refuses to succumb to pressure from mafias, gangsters, or lawbreakers while executing his official duties, noting that his parents taught him to fear God alone.

This ruling marks the 23rd death penalty handed down by the judge over the past four months. He warned that if judges yield to the might of strongmen and criminals while upholding the law, public faith in the judiciary would completely collapse.

Also read

Refusal to Compromise on Principles

Emphasizing his dedication to judicial ethics during the proceedings, the judge made his stance clear.

I would prefer to embrace death rather than be called a coward judge.

The judge also highlighted that he has been receiving threats from criminal syndicates and alleged that nearly 100 serious cases were withdrawn from his court to benefit wrongdoers. Citing security concerns after his protection detail in Muzaffarnagar was reportedly scaled down, he has sought enhanced security from senior officials.

Details of the Dowry Murder Case

Government counsel Kuldeep Kumar stated that the court convicted the accused, Nadeem, under relevant sections of the law and imposed a fine of one lakh rupees. The incident dates back to July 23, 2018, in the Shahpur town area, where Nadeem set his 23-year-old wife, Shahjadi, on fire following persistent demands for dowry.

Shahjadi was rushed in critical condition to Safdarjang Hospital in Delhi, where she eventually succumbed to her injuries. In her dying declaration recorded prior to her death, she directly accused Nadeem of setting her ablaze. Although all 11 prosecution witnesses turned hostile during the trial, the court relied on the victim's dying declaration to establish guilt and secure a conviction.

Surge in Capital Punishments and Administrative Transfers

Over the last four months, Judge Diwakar's fast-track court has awarded the death penalty to 23 individuals across 11 separate cases. Amidst these strict rulings, an administrative order in August transferred nearly 100 pending murder trials from his court to the bench of District and Sessions Judge Virendra Kumar Singh.

District Bar Association President Pramod Tyagi noted that the transfer took place amid apprehensions among lawyers and litigants that the fast-track court might hand down more death sentences. Meanwhile, safety concerns for judicial officers gained wider attention following an incident in Mumbai's Dadar area, where miscreants surrounded a judge's car in the middle of the road and issued death threats, prompting the local police to register a case against two individuals.

Questions & Answers

Which judge delivered the death sentences in Muzaffarnagar?
Additional District and Sessions Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar delivered the rulings.
How many death sentences has the judge delivered in recent months?
He has sentenced 23 people to death across 11 cases in the last 4 months.
What is the background of the specific dowry case mentioned?
The case relates to an incident on July 23, 2018, in Shahpur town where a woman was set on fire over dowry demands.
What was the name and age of the victim?
The victim was 23-year-old Shahjadi.
Who was convicted by the court in this case?
The court convicted an individual named Nadeem.
On what basis was the accused convicted even though witnesses turned hostile?
The court convicted the accused based on the victim's dying declaration recorded before her death.

Comments 1

Rohan Verma@rohan-verma·4m ago

The stringent rulings and security concerns raised by Additional Sessions Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar in Muzaffarnagar highlight critical questions regarding judicial protection and administrative oversight in Uttar Pradesh. Handing down 23 death sentences within four months while facing continuous threats from criminal syndicates underscores the urgent need for a robust security framework for judicial officers posted in sensitive districts. If higher authorities fail to address these security apprehensions promptly, it could severely impact the morale of fast-track courts and the effective delivery of justice.

Citizen journalism

Become a TrendKia journalist

Voice of the people

Share news, photos and videos from your area with TrendKia and let your voice reach the nation. Every citizen a journalist.

Join now
CH 01 LIVE
TrendKia TV ON AIR